|
Global Container Closure Integrity Testing Services Market (2022 to 2035) - by Type of Container Closure Systems, Type of Container Materials Tested and Key Geographical Regions
Thursday, March 24, 2022
DUBLIN, March 16, 2022 /PRNewswire/ -- The "Container Closure Integrity Testing Services Market by Type of Container Closure Systems, Type of Container Materials Tested, and Key Geographical Regions: Industry Trends and Global Forecasts, 2022-2035" report has been added to ResearchAndMarkets.com's offering.
https://mma.prnewswire.com/media/539438/Research_and_Markets_Logo.jpg
This report features an extensive study of the current landscape and the likely future potential of container closure integrity testing service providers, over the next decade. The study also features an in-depth analysis, highlighting the capabilities of various industry stakeholders engaged in this field.
Packaging is considered a critical aspect of pharmaceutical manufacturing. It is, therefore, imperative for drug manufacturers to ensure that formulations enclosed in primary containers are safe for consumption / administration. Despite being well established, there are several concerns associated with the drug packaging process, such as the risk of contamination, filling errors (inaccurate dose dispensation), complex packaging systems, integrity related concerns (pores, cracks and scratches) of container closure systems (such as vials, syringes, cartridges, IV bags, ampoules), and labelling-related issues. In fact, experts believe that around 80% of product recalls may be attributed to packaging-related concerns.
To ensure the safety of consumers, a lot of effort is put to eliminate contamination, filling errors and maintain integrity of packaged formulations. The industry has come up with several innovative techniques and technologies for the evaluation of both primary and secondary packaging components in order to maintain the sterility and stability of drug product. Moreover, regulatory bodies have enforced stringent guidelines to evaluate the integrity of container closure systems. As a result, container closure integrity testing has become a critical part of the overall manufacturing process. The techniques used for this purpose ensure precision and accuracy in leak detection, rapid results, non-destructive testing, affordable, reliable and easy integration in the manufacturing process.
Despite the benefits of container closure integrity testing methods, there is no one-size -fits-all solution to evaluate all the types of primary packaging. Additionally, the pharmaceutical and biopharmaceutical companies face various challenges in installing container closure integrity testing equipment due to limited expertise and infrastructure. Owing to these challenges, the drug manufacturers rely on container closure integrity testing service providers, which have well-equipped infrastructure and novel technology platforms, along with the required expertise. Moreover, outsourcing of container closure integrity testing assists the innovators to serve the clients in a timely and regulation-compliant manner. With the anticipated rise in the drug product market, the demand for packaging services is likely to increase in the future; this, in turn, will likely result in rise in demand for integrity testing services. Further advancements in testing methods and cost saving potential of such methods (by reducing the product wastage and ensuring the drug and patients safety) are expected to drive steady growth in the overall container closure integrity testing services market in the foreseen future.
In addition to other elements, the study includes:
-- A detailed assessment of the current market landscape of container
closure integrity testing service providers, featuring information on
their respective year of establishment, company size, location of
headquarters, location of analytical facilities, type(s) of analytical
method(s) offered (probabilistic methods and deterministic methods),
type(s) of probabilistic method(s) (microbial ingress analysis, aerosol
testing, dye ingress analysis, bubble testing, and tracer gas detection
(sniffle mode)), type(s) of deterministic method(s) offered (helium leak
analysis, vacuum / pressure decay analysis, mass extraction analysis,
high voltage leak detection, headspace analysis, and others), leakage
susceptibility (solid, liquid, and gas), type(s) of container(s) tested
(vials, syringes, cartridges, pouches, IV bags, ampoules, and others)
and accreditations (EMA, FDA, USP, ATSM, JP, ICH Q2, ISO, and others).
-- A competitiveness analysis of container closure integrity testing
service providers based on various relevant parameters, such as supplier
power (based on the experience / expertise of the service providers and
company size), service strength (type(s) of analytical method(s)
offered, type(s) of probabilistic method(s), type(s) of deterministic
method(s), and type(s) of container(s) tested) and service applicability
(type(s) of container material(s) and leakage susceptibility).
-- Tabulated profiles of the key players providing container closure
integrity testing, which are headquartered in North America and Europe.
Each profile includes an overview of the company, information on the
financial performance (if available), service portfolio, location of
analytical facilities, type(s) of analytical method(s) used, types(s) of
container(s) tested, recent developments, and an informed future
outlook.
-- A case study providing the list of equipment used by various
manufacturers to test container closure integrity, highlighting their
key features, type(s) of analytical method(s) offered, type(s) of
container(s) tested, container material(s) of container closure
integrity testing technologies.
-- A detailed competitiveness analysis of container closure integrity
testing equipment, taking into consideration several relevant
parameters, such as the product strength (scale of operation, type(s) of
analytical method(s) used) and product applicability (type(s) of
material(s) used, and type(s) of container(s) tested).
-- A regional capability assessment framework, which compares the container
closure integrity testing capability across key geographies, based on a
number of parameters, such as the number of container closure integrity
testing service providers, number of analytical testing facilities,
number of container closure integrity technology manufacturers in that
particular geographical region, number of container closure integrity
testing technologies, number of patents and demand of container closure
integrity testing service in that particular geographical region.
-- A detailed analysis of the various container closure integrity testing
analytical techniques. It highlights the popularity of analytical
techniques (in terms of number of service providers offering analytical
technique for testing purpose, equipment providers developing equipment
for particular technique, number of equipment and number of container
closure systems tested) and offers a benchmark to compare analytical
techniques.
-- A case study on the use of robotic machinery in pharmaceutical
manufacturing and fill / finish operations, highlighting the advantages
of using automation / automated technologies in such processes. Further,
it presents the profiles of industry players that provide such equipment
for aseptic processing of pharmaceuticals.
-- An in-depth analysis to estimate the current and future demand of
container closure integrity testing service based on various relevant
parameters, such as type of container closure system tested and type of
material used, across different regions, for the period 2022-2035.
-- A discussion on affiliated trends, key drivers and challenges, under a
comprehensive SWOT framework, which are likely to impact the industry's
evolution, including a Harvey ball analysis, highlighting the relative
effect of each SWOT parameter on the overall industry.
Key Questions Answered
-- Who are the leading players offering container closure integrity testing
service?
-- What is the relative competitiveness of container closure integrity
testing service providers?
-- In which regions are majority of the container closure integrity testing
facilities located?
-- Which type of equipment have the competitive edge over the other
container closure integrity testing equipment?
-- What is the current and future demand for container closure integrity
testing services?
-- How is the current and future opportunity likely to be distributed
across key market segments?
Key Topics Covered:
1. PREFACE
2. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
3. INTRODUCTION
4. MARKET LANDSCAPE
5. COMPANY COMPETITIVENESS ANALYSIS
5.1. Chapter Overview
5.2. Methodology
5.3. Key Parameters
5.4. Competitiveness Analysis: Companies Offering Container Closure Integrity Testing Services in North America
5.5. Competitiveness Analysis: Companies Offering Container Closure Integrity Testing Services in Europe and Asia-Pacific
5.6. Competitiveness Analysis: Companies Offering Container Closure Integrity Testing Services in One Analytical Facility
5.7. Competitiveness Analysis: Companies Offering Container Closure Integrity Testing Services in More than Analytical Facility
6. CONTAINER CLOSURE INTEGRITY TESTING SERVICE PROVIDERS IN NORTH AMERICA: COMPANY PROFILES
6.1. Chapter Overview
6.2. Berkshire Sterile Manufacturing
6.2.1. Company Overview
6.2.2. Financial Information
6.2.3. Service Portfolio
6.2.4. Recent Developments and Future Outlook
6.3. Curia
6.3.1. Company Overview
6.3.2. Financial Information
6.3.3. Service Portfolio
6.3.4. Recent Developments and Future Outlook
6.4. DDL
6.4.1. Company Overview
6.4.2. Financial Information
6.4.3. Service Portfolio
6.4.4. Recent Developments and Future Outlook
6.5. Nelson Labs
6.5.1. Company Overview
6.5.2. Financial Information
6.5.3. Service Portfolio
6.5.4. Recent Developments and Future Outlook
7. CONTAINER CLOSURE INTEGRITY TESTING SERVICE PROVIDERS IN EUROPE: COMPANY PROFILES
7.1. Chapter Overview
7.2. Confarma
7.2.1. Company Overview
7.2.2. Financial Information
7.2.3. Service Portfolio
7.2.4. Recent Developments and Future Outlook
7.3. Eurofins
7.3.1. Company Overview
7.3.2. Financial Information
7.3.3. Service Portfolio
7.3.4. Recent Developments and Future Outlook
7.4. SGS
7.4.1. Company Overview
7.4.2. Financial Information
7.4.3. Service Portfolio
7.4.4. Recent Developments and Future Outlook
7.5. Stevanato
7.5.1. Company Overview
7.5.2. Financial Information
7.5.3. Service Portfolio
7.5.4. Recent Developments and Future Outlook
7.6. Wilco
7.6.1. Company Overview
7.6.2. Financial Information
7.6.3. Service Portfolio
7.6.4. Recent Developments and Future Outlook
8. CASE STUDY: MARKET LANDSCAPE OF CONTAINER CLOSURE INTEGRITY TESTING EQUIPMENT PROVIDERS
8.1. Chapter Overview
8.2. Container Closure Integrity Testing Equipment: Market Landscape
8.2.1. Analysis by Scale of Operation
8.2.2. Analysis by Key Features
8.2.3. Analysis by Type(s) of Analytical Method(s) Offered
8.2.4. Analysis by Type(s) of Container Material(s) Tested
8.2.5. Analysis by Type(s) of Container(s) Tested
8.3. Container Closure Integrity Testing Equipment Providers: Developer Landscape
8.3.1. Analysis by Year of Establishment
8.3.2. Analysis by Company Size
8.3.3. Analysis by Location of Headquarters
8.3.4. Analysis by Company Size and Location of Headquarters
8.3.5. Leading Developers: Analysis by Number of Products
9. PRODUCT COMPETITIVENESS ANALYSIS
10. REGIONAL CAPABILITY ASSESSMENT
11. BENCHMARKING ANALYSIS
11.1. Chapter Overview
11.2. Methodology Assumptions and Key Assumption
11.3. Advantages and Disadvantages of Deterministic Methods
11.4. Advantages and Disadvantages of Probabilistic Methods
11.5. Benchmarking of CCIT Techniques
11.5.1. Distribution by Type(s) of Container(s) Tested
11.5.2. Distribution by Type of Container Material Tested
11.5.3. Distribution by Key Geographical Regions
12. CASE STUDY: ROBOTICS IN PHARMACEUTICAL PACKAGING
12.1. Chapter Overview
12.2. Role of Robots in the Pharmaceutical Industry
12.2.1. Key Considerations for Selecting a Robotic System
12.2.2. Advantages of Robotic Systems
12.2.3. Disadvantages of Robotic Systems
12.3. Companies Providing Robots for Pharmaceutical Industry
12.4. Companies Providing Equipment Integrated with Robotic Systems for Pharmaceutical Packaging
13. DEMAND ANALYSIS
14. MARKET FORECAST AND OPPORTUNITY ANALYSIS
15. SWOT ANALYSIS
16. CONCLUSION
17. EXECUTIVE INSIGHTS
18. APPENDIX 1: TABULATED DATA
19. APPENDIX 2: LIST OF COMPANIES AND ORGANIZATIONS
For more information about this report visit https://www.researchandmarkets.com/r/cctuzj
Media Contact:
Research and Markets
Laura Wood, Senior Manager
press@researchandmarkets.com
For E.S.T Office Hours Call +1-917-300-0470
For U.S./CAN Toll Free Call +1-800-526-8630
For GMT Office Hours Call +353-1-416-8900
U.S. Fax: 646-607-1904
Fax (outside U.S.): +353-1-481-1716
View original content:https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/global-container-closure-integrity-testing-services-market-2022-to-2035---by-type-of-container-closure-systems-type-of-container-materials-tested-and-key-geographical-regions-301504185.html
SOURCE Research and Markets
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Asetek - Mandatory Notification of Trade | Jan 22, 2026
|
|
BC.GAME to Host "Stay Untamed" Night During Abu Dhabi's Packed Web3 Summit Week | Jan 22, 2026
|
|
Rent Manager Earned Best Real Estate Software Product Award and Multiple Review Badges from G2 Platform | Jan 22, 2026
|
|
Tomorrowland Brings the Magic to Shanghai for a Spectacular First Indoor Edition in China | Jan 22, 2026
|
|
Auburn University's Applied Research Institute Expands Advanced Manufacturing Capabilities with CF3D Enterprise Cell | Jan 22, 2026
|
|
California Divorce Mediation Center Unveils Modern Website Redesign | Jan 22, 2026
|
|
AMPERA ANNOUNCES LOCATION FOR GLOBAL HEADQUARTERS | Jan 22, 2026
|
|
Gemmy Alerts Customers: Fake Websites Target Holiday Decorators | Jan 22, 2026
|
|
Culture and tourism sectors thrive in Xiamen | Jan 22, 2026
|
|
AMPLIFY Named Finalist in Three Categories at the 2026 Golden Gavel Awards | Jan 22, 2026
|
|
|
|
